Archive for January, 2006

01 29th, 2006

Tetris — Data?

Hypnotic — the only way to describe it. It gets in your brain and it’s almost impossible to shift thoughts without a radical distraction.

So tonight, I was scanning the news, just catching up, and I don’t know what triggered it, but I thought about Tetris. In particular, that Nintendo 64 game. (Doesn’t that seem like lightyears ago when it came out?) Ever since Tetris was released, I’ve been addicted to the simplicity and incredibly challenging nature of that game. Worse, I’m addicted — to the music.

So, I was trying to wrap up a project tonight and I was listening to some internet techno station (Green Lounge, great for writing) and I started thinking about that music. And, I was afraid to get up and plug the game in. Sure, that would stop my Tetris jonesing — but I wouldn’t get any work done.

Yeah, right. As if I’d get work done sitting at this pc with that music in my brain.

So, I sat here, and searched, and searched, and searched.

And it is facinating. I found several interesting threads by programmers/hacks trying to break the code. Apparently, the soundtrack is built into the game — some midi specially encoded data stream. Not easy to “decode”. (This is way beyond me. Demographics, mapping, I know. Even a little Basic I can handle.) I have learned that there are lots of people (which is scrary in itself) who have taken Neil Voss’s soundtrack and reworked it…painstakingly.

To their defense, once you hear that soundtrack, none other will do.

Anyway…if like me, you have some game that you spent too many hours playing and have an urge to get the soundtrack — here’s a great resource. http://gh.ffshrine.org


Author: Data Diva

I’m always on the lookout for new tools to help my clients characterize and segment their customers into easily marketable target groups.

For years, it seemed like Claritas was the only game in town. And when I worked for them, I liked it that way. I must admit, they did they have an incredible marketing engine. Plus, they hired top notch people, and let them apply their tools in novel applications. They were aggressive and knowledgeable — a killer combination.

When I first started selling for Claritas, I used to make this analogy. Remember high school — and all those cliques that formed? You had the jocks, the geeks, the cool kids, and even the invisibles. Despite the fact that “school spirit” is all about one for all and all for one — it’s human nature for like to attract like. Now not all the popular girls, jocks, etc. were exactly alike — however, they had certain things in common that made them stick together under certain circumstances.

Marketers know that its human nature for people to bond and gather with other people that share common characteristics. And they seize on that — using data and computers — to get messages out to prospects that are similar to their best customers. Now, there’s no way that everyone in a neighborhood, much less a street is exactly the same. However, if you look around your own town, you can easily see that there is a wealthy section, an ethnic section, a college dweller section, even the “poor side of the tracks”.

Back to Claritas. Sure, there were other companies, other systems out there (MicroVision, ClusterPlus, Acorn, etc.) but no other company seemed to focus on getting links to syndicated data souces like Claritas.

The crazy thing is that this is one of the EASIEST things in the world to do. If you are not familiar with commercially available marketing tools like PRIZM, Tapestry, MOSAIC, Cohorts, Personix — here’s how it works.

99% of all the commercially available systems (likely 100% but I’m not positive!) start with a “base” of data from the good old US Census. Through the magic of powerful computing strength under the watch of a team of demographers and statisticians, a data soup base is started. Each company adds its own data to the mix — usually list counts, behavioral data (from surveys, warranty cards), magazine subscription data, auto ownership — even aggregated credit data — for a unique flavor.

There are a variety of techniques that are used, but suffice it to say, at the end of the day, a number of groupings (aka clusters, types, segments) are formulated. Each group has a great deal of similarity on a number of characteristics (such as home value, presence of children, degree of urbanicity, etc.)

It’s easy to apply commercial segmentation systems because most of them create assignments for neighborhoods at a variety of levels — ZIP+4, Block Group, etc. and can assign types by geocode. (A geocode is series of numbers that tells you the State, County, Tract and block group an address or location is coordinated with. Latitude/Longitude codes let you put an address on a map. “Point coding” is the term most commonly used.)

So, anything that has an address on it can be geocoded and likely point coded, and therefore can be crossreferenced by the commercial segmentation system.

What does that mean? Well, all surveys that contain an address can be type coded, all transactional records can be coded, etc. etc. And that is pretty powerful stuff.

So, back to IRI and Acxiom. This is a brilliant move. IRI has great household level panel data, and now, their Personix tool will be able to link segments (types, clusters, “cliques”) by the household products they purchase — using REAL transactional data. How incredibly cool is that?
Here’s the announcement.

@import “http://www.highbeam.com/css/docLink.css”;

from: IRI and Acxiom(R) Introduce More Efficient and Actionable Approach To Consumer Segmentation and Targeted Marketing.

source: Business Wire, January 25, 2006.

via: HighBeam Research Logo HighBeam™ Research

COPYRIGHT 2006 Business Wire

@import “from:%20%20IRI and Acxiom(R) Introduce More Efficient and Actionable Approach To Consumer Segmentation and Targeted Marketing.
source: Business Wire, January 25, 2006.
via: http://www.highbeam.com?refid=blogger”> src=”http://www.highbeam.com/img/h-icon-small.gif” alt=”HighBeam Research Logo” border=”0″ align=”baseline”/> HighBeam™ Research
COPYRIGHT 2006 Business Wire


Author: Data Diva

So, I had all these great plans when I first set up this blog.

I spend so much time talking with colleagues about what is happening out there in our little data-driven world, that I thought I could spend some time every night jotting down something pithy. For what its worth, anyone with a few spare moments and a browser can comment on anything.

Was I ever wrong.

Seems like everytime things slow down a little bit — I get some stupid brainstorm about how I’m going to improve myself and my business. (Yes, as a consultant, you live your life pitching projects, waiting, then scrambling when they come through only to sit on the bench again in between assignments, with time to dream up new things to do, only to just get started on one of these new brainstorms and then have 5 projects drop at once.)

(Sigh.)

Anyway, dear sporadic reader, if indeed anyone is out there… do you think we’ve gotten to the point where you can define who who are by what you’re not?

I started thinking about that a long time ago, working on a project that involved a bank. They were starting a new debit card for people who didn’t have traditional accounts. As we tried to figure out how to find these people and learn their characteristics, it became increasingly obvious that we weren’t going to find surveys that said “are you unbanked”??

Once I was able to talk through the definition of what we were looking for we were able to use a big, national, syndicated survey to find the population that was “not”. Did “not” have credit cards, did “not” have lines of credit, etc. etc. And sure enough, when we finished creating this definition, we wound up with what we wanted. The project was a smashing success because we gave up looking for the obvious answers.

Sometimes, we’re so focused on looking for a specific list of characteristics that we forget that there is more than one way to peel the apple. (I hate saying “skin the cat”…we used to have 5 felines living with us.)

People have been using the negative to find the positive in data modeling and mining for years. And, on a personal basis (when dating for example, or hiring new employees) you have certainly heard someone rattle off what they didn’t want — as if experience showed that what you aren’t can be almost as important as what you are.

Am not sure if I am a better business manager, client service person, wife, mother because of the things I’m not. Right now, I’m not exactly profilic with my writing. Am certainly going to try to spend a little more time waxing poetic on something in this blog — hopefully, about data. It’s one of those things I think about. (God, I feel like such a geek when I say that.) And when I’m silent, its not because I don’t have anything to say…

Makes me think of one of my favorite Ani DiFranco songs… “Asking too Much”

I want somebody who sees the pointlessness
and still keeps their purpose in mind
I want somebody who has a tortured soul
some of the time
I want somebody who will either put out for me
or put me out of misery
or maybe just put it all to words
and make me say, you knowI never heard it put that way
make me say, what did you just say?
I want somebody who can hold my interest
hold it and never let it fall
someone who can flatten me with a kiss
that hits like a fist
or a sentence, that stops me like a brick wall
because if you hear me talking
listen to what I’m not saying
if you hear me playing guitar
listen to what I’m not playing
and don’t ask me to put words
to all the spaces between notes
in fact if you have to ask, forget it
do and you’ll regret it
I’m tired of being the interesting one
I’m tired of heving fun for two
just lay yourself on the line
and I might lay myself down by you
but don’t sit behind your eyes
and wait for me to surprise you
I want somebody who can make me
scream until it’s funny
give me a run for my moneyI
want someone who can
twist me up in knots
tell me, for the woman who has everything
what have you got?
I want someone who’s not afraid of me
or anyone else
in other words I want someone
who’s not afraid of themself

do you think I’m asking too much?


Author: Data Diva